Last updated: 22 September 2026
This site was rejected by Google AdSense for low-value content, and the version of it that got rejected deserved it: a hundred near-identical posts, earnings figures nobody could check, and “top pick” boxes for tools I had never opened. This page is the set of rules I rebuilt it under. It is here so you can hold me to them.
Who writes here
Everything is written and edited by Marcos Bustos, one person, in Valencia, Spain. There are no guest posts, no ghostwriters, no agency content, and nothing published under an invented byline. If that ever changes, the author of the article will say so at the top.
Where AI is used, and where it is not
I use AI, mostly Claude, to research, outline, draft sections and tidy up my own writing. This is a site about AI tools; pretending otherwise would be silly. What it does not do:
- Nothing is published automatically. No draft goes live the way a model produced it.
- Every number, price, plan limit and quoted rule is checked by me against the source before it is published, and the source is linked.
- Opinions, criticisms and recommendations are mine. A model does not get to decide which tool is better.
- Screenshots are real screen captures from my own accounts and my own projects. If an illustration was generated, the caption says so.
What “tested” means on this site
An article says I tested or I use something only when I ran it myself, on a real task, and it will tell you the date and which plan I was on, free or paid. Where I compare a tool I have not used, the article says clearly that it is not tested and compares it only from the vendor’s own published documentation and pricing, with a link and the date I checked it.
That distinction is the whole point. “Not tested, here is what the documentation says, checked on this date” is useful. “Our number one pick” for something I have never opened is not, and it is how this blog got itself into trouble.
Prices and dates
AI tools change their pricing constantly. Every price on this site carries the date it was checked, and articles carry a last-updated date in the byline. If you are reading something months old, treat the prices as a starting point and confirm them on the vendor’s site.
Corrections
If something here is wrong, write to vireltify@gmail.com with the URL and what is wrong. Small fixes, such as an outdated price, are made quietly and the updated date changes. Anything that changes the conclusion of an article gets a dated correction note at the end of that article. Articles are not silently deleted to make a mistake disappear.
No income claims
This site does not publish earnings figures, income projections, or anything shaped like “make X per month”. Articles about freelancing, blogging, affiliate programs or digital products explain how the thing works, what it costs, what it demands from you and where it usually fails. What anyone earns depends on their skills, their market, their time and a good deal of luck, and nobody writing a blog post can promise you a number.
Where I mention my own projects, I describe what actually happened, including the parts that went nowhere.
What is off limits
- Client work. I build websites for other people, and none of it appears here: no client sites, no client screenshots, no anonymised case studies. Their projects are not my content.
- Paid coverage. No sponsored posts, no paid reviews, no paid links, no “pay to be included in the comparison”. These are not for sale.
- Scraped or spun content. Nothing here is someone else’s article with the words swapped around.
Advertising
The site is meant to carry Google AdSense advertising. Google selects those ads, not me, and I have no relationship with the advertisers you see. Ads are kept out of the middle of a sentence and off the page in numbers that would make articles hard to read.
I will never ask you to click an ad, and you will not find “support this site by clicking the ads” anywhere here: that breaks Google’s rules on invalid clicks, and it would be asking you to do something worthless for you. I do not click the ads on my own site either, and no traffic to this site is bought.
Affiliate links
At the time of writing I am not in any affiliate programme, so there is nothing to disclose yet, and any link to a tool is a plain link marked nofollow.
If that changes, the rules are fixed in advance: affiliate links are marked sponsored nofollow, labelled in the text where they appear and not only in a footer, used only for tools I have actually used, and they never change a recommendation, a score or the order of a comparison. The disclosure page is updated the same day, not later.
How articles are put together
There is no house template here any more. A comparison, a walkthrough and a write-up of something that broke are different jobs and should look different. A question-and-answer section appears only when readers actually ask those questions, not as filler at the bottom of every post. If an article has nothing to add beyond what the vendor’s own page already says, it does not get published.